April 7 , 2008
SoCTL
The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning at CTL
The Digital Divide: Access to Technology
Part 1 of an SoCTL Series
Chalk is a technology. Really. So are college-ruled paper, the number 2 pencil, Xerox machines and a lot of other objects of educational daily life. A colleague of mine reminded me of chalk’s innovative beginnings recently, during a discussion at CTL’s Realizing Student Potential/ITeach conference. While his point went on to be about the appropriate use of technology (i.e., we should use chalk for some things and a Smart Board for others), it also said a lot about our fears of technology. (Why would we need to remind ourselves that chalk is a technology if we aren’t just a little bit afraid of the Smart Board?) While the discussion of the appropriate use of other classroom technologies is an important and ongoing one, it depends on the very complex issue of whether some faculty members and some of our students are ready to use some forms of technology in the classroom, and whether we are doing everything we can to bring everyone up to the speed of technological advances.
In this SoCTL series, I’ll get at some of the major factors contributing to what’s largely called “the digital divide,” with a more focused look at the problems specific to our campuses and classrooms: student access to technology, lack of skill, the speed at which we make technological adaptations, and the disparity between faculty and student views on appropriate uses of technology. In this month’s column, I’ll focus on the issue of access. In future SoCTLs, I’ll go into each of the other factors in more detail.
The access problem starts before our students enter our virtual or physical campus doors. The March, 2008 edition of NEA Today highlights the digital divide in a feature article entitled “Mind the Gap: It's a high-speed, high-def, Wi-Fi world. But not for everybody.” The article explains how the problem is being addressed in the world of secondary education, and can give us a picture of the students that will be coming to our classrooms in the very near future. There is still a gap in our society between those who have access to computers and broadband Internet outside of school and those who don’t. This lack of access is much more common in underserved and low-income populations, as well as in rural communities. A recent study by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, A Nation Online: Entering the Broadband Age, shows some very interesting patterns:
- Among Internet users, those with broadband connections at home are more likely to be daily Internet users (66.1 percent) than those with dial-up service (51.1 percent).
- A lower percentage of Internet households have broadband connections in rural areas (24.7 percent) than in urban areas (40.4 percent).
- Rural households with dial-up connections are significantly more likely than their urban counterparts to list "Not Available" as the reason they do not have a higher speed Internet connection (22.1 percent to 4.7 percent, respectively).
So who has broadband at home? The following data comes from a report on the Pew Internet & American Life Survey, December 2007:
- Percent of internet users by race:
- White: 55
- Black: 38
- English-Speaking Hispanics: 57
- Percent of internet users by income:
- <$30K Income: 40
- >$75K Income: 77
- Percent of internet users by location:
- Rural: 42
- Urban: 60
Access to computers and the Internet leads to use of those technologies--and eventually proficiency in Web navigation, basic document creation, and electronic communication. All of these are essential skills in most post-secondary classes AND the modern working world. Recognizing this fact, there are some individuals advocating government-assisted universal access. Short of government aid, there are other ways that people can acquire low-cost computers for home use. At techsoup.org, would-be users or their advocates can search by country or ZIP code for companies or groups that refurbish used computers and either donate or resell them to families or individuals in need. A quick search of my own ZIP code yielded information on Boy Scout Troop 929 in Rosemount, Minnesota, which “will refurbish computers for under-privileged, handicapped, and or non profit organizations.”
As Linda Russell points out in her Teaching in the Disciplines column, the technological under-preparedness of incoming students, often resulting from their reduced access to technology, is possibly the biggest problem that our faculty members face around the digital divide issue. The next SoCTL installment on the digital divide will provide some research and insight on the subject of technology skills—of both students and faculty.
-Martin Springborg
Full citations appear at the bottom of this HTML version and in the PDF version.
CTL Resources for Faculty
Minding the Gap
This month, I’ll highlight one resource that addresses some issues surrounding the gap in technology access and information literacy—and how this may affect students in our classrooms. I’ll also offer an additional resource about using technology effectively in the classroom.
Henry Jenkins, who teaches at MIT, is considered to be a preeminent expert on this topic. In a report commissioned by the MacArthur Foundation titled “Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century,” Jenkins and his colleagues identify what they call “the participation gap,” where there is uneven access to the technology-related opportunities, experiences, skills, and knowledge that they believe prepare youth to fully participate in today’s culture and the world of tomorrow. The authors further state that this gap creates additional obstacles to learning how media shapes perception of the world. “Access to this participatory culture functions as a new form of the hidden curriculum, shaping which youth will succeed and which will be left behind as they enter school and the workplace.”
Faculty members should explore how best to use technology in their classrooms. Thriving in Academe is a joint project of the National Education Association and the Professional and Organizational Development network in Higher Education. It is a collection of articles about teaching and learning in higher education—many offering advice from faculty members. One online article from that source, “Technology: Can it Help You?” explores how technology can fit into a classroom and concludes the technologies integrated into courses and curricula “should add value, not merely be an ‘add-on.’” Technology should be used as additional teaching strategies that are effective and appealing to both professors and students and meet the goal of increased student learning.
–Thomas Wortman
Links from Resources for Faculty
CTL ITeach Center, Resources and Tools:
http://www.ctl.mnscu.edu/iteach/resources/ni_itrt.php
Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture:
http://www.projectnml.org/files/working/NMLWhitePaper.pdf
Technology: Can it Help You?:
http://www2.nea.org/he/head9697/advo9810/feature.html
Thriving in Academe:
http://www2.nea.org/he/advo-new/thriving.html
Teaching in the Disciplines
Linda Russell, Minneapolis Community and Technical College
As a developmental reading instructor I see great diversity in our classes. At my college, although we have increased numbers of younger students, we still have an average age that is in the mid-twenties, as well as many students who are much older. But beyond age diversity, what we have in large part is a population of mostly low-income students who have very little discretionary money to purchase computers or monthly internet subscriptions. Despite all the talk about our “wired” youth, I am reminded every semester that the ubiquitous computer in every kid’s bedroom is not the norm for most of our students.
Why is that an issue? We are expected to join the headlong race to online learning. We’ve got D2L, and our administrators and our students clamor for us to put our course materials, grades, and other aspects of our courses into the D2L environment. The capacity for the online features to supplant traditional interactions, use of class time, and distribution of materials brings both opportunity and problems. On one hand, I’ve had students quickly catch up after an absence because of the availability of materials and the chance to submit their work and take their quizzes from home. On the other hand, here are comments from my students this semester:
I tried to take that quiz online, but I got to the lab and it was closed. I don’t have a computer at home. What should I do?
I couldn’t get to a computer before that dropbox folder due date, so I couldn’t submit my work.
I have dial up Internet, and something weird happened while I was trying to take that quiz. It all froze up and didn’t save my answers. I got a zero.
I know I was supposed to bring that article, but I have to get it printed in a computer lab, and I don’t have time to get there before our class.
Access is one issue, but skill is another. If our students aren’t wealthy enough to purchase every new gizmo, they have not had the chance to become skilled users of new technology either. Many of my developmental reading students are not experienced in reading screens. They miss important information that is in a sidebar, get lost moving from screen to screen, and don’t necessarily notice all of the helpful menus and tabs that are supposed to improve navigation. They haven’t mastered the lingo, thus they get things mixed up (What’s the difference between Paging and Email? What’s the difference between add message and reply in Discussion?) I have to be sure to overtly teach the skills of navigating and using D2L in addition to reading strategies.
As is often the case, we need to be careful about our assumptions. Perhaps we should poll our classes to find out how many students have 24 hour access to online materials. For those who do not, we must be sure we don’t put them at a disadvantage by offering materials only online or posting materials too late for students to access them before class. For reading students (and most other developmental level students) we should provide clear and easy directions for the tasks we are requiring, such as attaching documents, navigating web sites or D2L, or even emailing us. Then we might not get the email that I received this semester:
Hey Ms Russell I email u 2 let u kno I kept tryin 2 take the quiz but the computer wouldnt download the “lock thing” so I dont kno wha 2 do about taken it I dont have a computer at home and library computer dont let you download ethier…so wha am I to do?
Dates to Remember!
SPRING DISCIPLINE WORKSHOPS
Teaching Culture in World Language Classes
April 11, 2008 • Minneapolis Community and Technical College
Keynote Speaker: Andrew Cohen, University of Minnesota
Ethics of Science/Medicine: The Power to Heal, The Power to Harm
April 11 - 12, 2008 • Inver Hills Community College
Presenter/Facilitator: Stephen Feinberg, Holocaust Museum, Washington, D.C.
Keynote Speaker: John Eyler, University of Minnesota
In-Depth Understanding of China: Mini-Workshops Part 4 of 4: China’s Past, Present and Future: Understanding the Past to be able to Work Towards the Future
April 16, 2008 • Bemidji State University
2008 MBEI Spring Mini-Conference: Innovative Instructional Technologies
April 18, 2008 • Inver Hills Community College
A+ in Mathematics: Algebra and Much More
April 25 - 26, 2008 • Duluth Entertainment Convention Center
CTL SUMMER ONLINE COURSES
Getting Started: An Overview of Teaching Online
Session 1: June 2 - June 29, 2008 - 20 participants
Session 2: July 7 - August 3, 2008 - 20 participants
Using Web 2.0 Tools in Instruction: Wikis, Blogs, Podcasting,
and Webinars (ED590)
Instructor: Rhonda Ficek Online: 2 credits, 20 Participants
July 7 - August 1, 2008
PHILOSOPHY OF COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION COURSE
http://facultycourses.mnscu.edu
Summer Session: May 27 - August 22, 2008 • Online
Fall Session: August 29 – December 19, 2008 • Online
PROJECT KALEIDOSCOPE: KEEPING STUDENTS ENGAGED IN STEM http://pkal.project.mnscu.edu/
April 24 – 25, 2008 • Southwest Minnesota State University
Teaching Tip of the Month
Techno Fix? Not Exactly…
It may be true that online instruction and hybrid instruction allow us to use our course instruction time in different ways than the traditional face-to-face classroom. But if you think that a course shell is an equalizer for your students you may have quite a surprise.
Mark Taylor (keynote speaker at the Realizing Student Potential • ITeach Conference) described today’s students as technological wizards. And when it comes to using a lot of electronic gadgets, it is key that we remember that they all cost money. Some of our students, however, don’t come from a background of having those experiences.
We continue to have identified more learning issues—some economic and some behavioral. Equal access for students in the K-12 system is not a reality; and as higher education instructors we see a wider variety of students.
In your syllabus and course shell, it is prudent to remember that many students (especially those in their first semester) are new to this technology and the discipline it takes to learn in a more autonomous environment. Some relied on libraries and school computer labs to gain access to the Internet and applications needed to develop the necessary skills of a student today. Provide Help Desk information, links to tutorials, and schedules for hands-on help sessions to better use D2L and other course management software.
Faculty know how important our own training is. We can’t assume that these “next generation” students will succeed if they don’t have similar instruction in using these tools. The digital divide and experiential gap are alive and well. What ways can you offer your students the means to bridge them?
-Zala Fashant
CTL News
“Keeping Students Engaged in STEM”
A Conference to Build a Systemwide Network
Location: Southwest Minnesota State University
April 25-26, 2008
Ever feel like the lone ranger as you work to improve student learning outcomes in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)? Do you have ideas and successful work to share? A network is an answer to these questions and more.
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities has been selected to be one of four systems nationwide to partner in a National Science Foundation grant to build and sustain regional networks of faculty and administrators committed to improving STEM teaching and learning.
Leadership for the grant is provided by Project Kaleidoscope, a nationwide informal alliance of colleges and universities committed to building and sustaining strong undergraduate STEM programs.
Our system’s STEM faculty include national leaders in every discipline, and many of them have conducted very successful experiments in instructional innovation. But everyone involved in such change knows that there are challenges: time, money, student motivation, administrative inertia, isolation among one’s peers. If you are interested getting together to change that, then go to www.ctl.mnscu.edu. There you can see the agenda, register, and get additional information.
–Thomas Wortman
Mark Your Calendars!
CTL Summer Courses for
Teaching Online
Teaching Online Workshop
June 2 –29 or July 7 – August 3
Using Web 2.0 Tools in Instruction
July 7 – August 1
CTL Report
The First-Year Student in the 21st Century Rated Highly by Participants
“This was one of the best ITeach Conferences I have attended. It offered a wide range of topics that were very beneficial to me as an instructor.” Conference participant
The 2008 Realizing Student Potential • ITeach Conference was held February 28 – March 1, 2008 on the campus of Minneapolis Community and Technical College. The conference theme, The First-Year Student in the 21st Century, was conveyed throughout its programming which also added best practices in teaching and learning and best practices in teaching with technology. 1100 faculty, administrators and students participated in 150 peer-reviewed sessions presented by nearly 200 of their colleagues.
Conference attendees had the opportunity to hear keynote speaker Mark Taylor, on Thursday evening. Mark’s interactive session, Generation NeXt Comes to College–Hardwired focused on how these students use technology, what their expectations are, and how faculty can use technologies for more effective and engaging student learning. On Friday morning, Mark presented a follow-up concurrent session.
Friday morning provided an excellent opportunity for participants to learn from Betsy Barefoot, Co-Director and Senior Scholar for the Policy Center on the First Year of College. In her keynote address, Engaging Today’s First-Year Students: Challenges and Opportunities in the Classroom, she reviewed the latest strategies to engage new students more effectively which could be employed across disciplines and classes which varied in size and level of proficiency. In addition to her keynote, Betsy presented a concurrent session on First-Year Teaching Across the Disciplines.
The remainder of the day offered three blocks of concurrent, mini and extended sessions as well as, facilitated and impromptu conversation cafés. Poster sessions and discipline meetings were scheduled between Block A and B. Saturday’s schedule included 10 workshops, offered in two 2-hour blocks, focusing primarily on D2L and other teaching with technology best practices.
With such a large audience, this conference has truly become The Great Minnesota Teaching and Learning Get-Together!
“I am looking forward to going next year and being able to attend the entire conference.” Conference participant
-Zala Fashant
Featured Event
Ethics of Science/Medicine: The Power to Heal, The Power to Harm
Locations: Inver Hills Community College and the Science Museum of MN
April 11 - April 12, 2008
This event is a 2-day, interdisciplinary workshop and is running in conjunction with the Minnesota Science Museum exhibit, “Deadly Medicine: Creating the Master Race Exhibition.” The educational outreach activity is directed at increasing participants' awareness and knowledge of what happens when science is used to forfeit individual rights for the proposed benefit of a particular contingent.
All participants who attend this workshop will receive an educational CD-Rom that has been produced by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum and an Instructional Guide developed by a team of MnSCU educators that provide lesson plans for classroom application across the disciplines.
A video conferencing session will take place on Friday, April 11 from 1:00 to 2:30 pm will feature Eva Kor, a Holocaust survivor and victim of "Deadly Medicine.” If you would like to be connected to this live presentation, please contact Dot Vogel or Vicky Knickerbocker at Inver Hills Community College.
Dot's email is
dvogel@inverhills.edu.
Vicky's email is
vknicke@inverhills.edu.
-Martin Springborg
Subcribe to CTL Monthly Update!
You may already be receiving the Update from your CTL Leader, but if you’d like your own subscription, just go to http://groups.google.com/group/ctl-update, and click on, “Join this group.” You can subscribe using your gmail account, or use any other email address. Don’t miss a single issue!
![]()
SoCTL Citations
Long, C. (2008). It's a high-speed, high-def, Wi-Fi world. But not for everybody. NEA Today, March 2008, 24-31.
Gallagher, M. (2004). A Nation Online: Entering the Broadband Age. Retrieved April 3, 2008, from the National Telecommunications and Information Administration Web site: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/anol/NationOnlineBroadband04.htm
Fox, S. (2008). Internet Evolution: Degrees of Access: Internet, Cell Phone, and Home Broadband. Retrieved April 3, 2008, from the Pew Internet & American Life Project Web site: http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/223/presentation_display.asp

