| SoCTL Last week’s SoCTL discussed faculty peer mentorship, and outlined some key principles of successful mentor/mentee relationships. Mentorships can in themselves lead to some exciting improvements on campuses, but they often feed and inspire other closely-related programs such as peer review of teaching.
Peer review (or observation) of teaching is a practice of formative evaluation that some faculty have come to embrace as a welcome alternative or supplement to traditional summative course evaluation. In Preparing for Peer Observation: A Guidebook , Marilla Svinicki and Karron Lewis note the importance of a faculty peer mentorship component to peer observation and formative evaluation.
However, despite many benefits to peer evaluation, there are faculty members that are reluctant to participate in such a process. In their article Collaborative Peer Review: The Role of Faculty in Improving College Teaching, Larry Keig and Michael Waggoner note several “disincentives,” from faculty attitudes toward academic freedom to their values with respect to the institution's rewards. They also offer practical incentives for increasing faculty interest and participation. Some may be of great assistance as you try to develop a peer evaluation program on your campus.
To learn more about faculty peer observation and evaluation, including the process of establishing an effective program on your campus, visit the following online sources:
Svinicki, Marilla and Lewis, Karron. (1995). Preparing for Peer Observation: A Guidebook. Retrieved October 4, 2006, from The University of Texas at Austin Center for Teaching Effectiveness Web site: http://www.utexas.edu/academic/cte/PeerObserve.html
Keig, Larry and Waggoner, Michael D. (Volume 23-2).Collaborative Peer Review: The Role of Faculty in Improving College Teaching. Retrieved October 4, 2006, from ERIC Higher Education Digests as provided by The National Teaching and Learning Forum Web site: http://www.ntlf.com/html/lib/bib/digests.htm. |